"We've played better baseball in all facets," he said after Thursday's loss. 316 and Esteury Ruiz leads the American League with 13 stolen bases.Īthletics manager Mark Kotsay hopes to bring all aspects together against the Royals. Meanwhile the Athletics have allowed 244 runs (7.63 per game), easily the most in baseball, while also allowing the most hits (326) and walks (163).īrent Rooker leads Oakland with career bests in homers (nine) and RBIs (22) while hitting. The Royals rank last in on-base percentage and walks drawn. The Athletics and Royals rank among the bottom five in several offensive categories, including runs and batting average. Thursday's 5-3 loss was their 12th in their last 13 home games and left Oakland with a 3-15 home mark, which is slightly better than Kansas City's 2-14 home record. The A's are coming off the heels of being swept at home by the Seattle Mariners. The clubs have the two worst records in baseball.Ī's starters are winless in the club's first 32 games, a major league record to start a season. And in many cases you won't know if it is bot/scrapper as UA can be faked.īut yes, if strict enforcement comes from AMP cache implementations along with rate limits, this could work.May 5 - It's a race to the bottom as the Oakland Athletics arrive Friday in Kansas City for a weekend series with the Royals. However, If scrapper/bot reads from my server I can always introduce rate limits and block access at the webserver (such as apache, ngix) level, because I have visibility and control on who is visiting my problem with robot.txt is, except the top few, I have seldom found bots to respect robot.txt. Note that in case scrapper/bot read amp-caches programmatically, publisher cannot even find a trace (as javascript based analytics won't work, and server logs are not available at publishers end.). So workable solution is a intermediate service (from cache provider) which first validates legitimate calls and then only allow contents to be fetched rather than content is fetched from cache and browser(viewer) validating if a legitimate call?Not sure how reCaptcha will work in AMP.Īlso server side rate limits are also desired if in case scrapper abuse faster than before availability of content. But certainly scrappers find ways to fetch content without comment is worth notable in this regard. Good browsers and people will mostly allow scripts. scrappers and bots are not practically affected by component visibility on UI. Also, you can read more about how AMP cache works at Let me know if that answers your question. I have gone through amp-access docs and found that currently only browser visibility based option is available and server side access control option is still the amp team is planning to add support for recaptcha in AMP as per #2273 allow publishers to be in control of cache access.Īs a standard practice third party cache providers should also document how they delineate bots and scrappers to dose-off publishers' concern of the their content.A way I can configure rate limiting or any other access features on reading third party AMP cache? Sort of amp-manifest embedded in amp-pages which indicates rate limits, humans only access control logic, bots control (like robots.txt) etc. help propagate standards to third-party cacheĢ.based on this I can choose to allow only the legit third party cache to crawl my origin server for AMP cache.Is there a documentation/reference/case where I can find how Google AMP cache or third party cache validates humans vs bots (like reCaptcha).I don't want scrappers and bots (except a few ) to crawl the site or store and re-use content. I am impressed the way AMP contents is delivered, However, as a niche content creator, I am little concerned over the scrapping door the amp caches open up. (Sorry for not sticking to issue guideline as this was generic concern)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |